Texas Natural Population Increase Rate By County in 2013
Updated on June 30, 2022.
According to the US Census Bureau estimates, in 2013, the natural population increase rate for Texas was 7.83, and the top three counties that had the highest natural population increase rate were:
- Webb: 16.24
- Starr: 15.82
- Hidalgo: 15.33
On the other hand, the top 3 counties that had the lowest natural population increase rate were:
- Cottle: -18.45
- McMullen: -13.4
- Real: -11.69
Use the interactive visualization and the table below to explore the natural population increase rate for each Texas county in 2013.
Natural Population Increase Rate refers to the natural increase (number of births minus number of deaths) during a year per 1,000 population at midyear.
You may also be interested in:
Related Topics: Texas Census Vintage Data Topic List.
Data Source: US Census Bureau (Vintage).
See this for other years:
Texas Natural Population Increase Rate By County in 2013
Texas Natural Population Increase Rate By County in 2013
Items per page:
25
0 of 0
| County | Natural Pop. Increase Rate |
|---|---|
| Anderson | -0.57 |
| Andrews | 12.96 |
| Angelina | 3.28 |
| Aransas | -4.9 |
| Archer | -1.48 |
| Armstrong | -3.6 |
| Atascosa | 6.16 |
| Austin | 2.38 |
| Bailey | 6.03 |
| Bandera | -1.99 |
| Bastrop | 3.57 |
| Baylor | -8.09 |
| Bee | 5.58 |
| Bell | 14.09 |
| Bexar | 7.84 |
| Blanco | -3.57 |
| Borden | 6.35 |
| Bosque | -2.17 |
| Bowie | 2.03 |
| Brazoria | 7.39 |
| Brazos | 8.39 |
| Brewster | 6.79 |
| Briscoe | -2.55 |
| Brooks | 3.46 |
| Brown | -2.44 |
| Burleson | -0.69 |
| Burnet | 0.28 |
| Caldwell | 4.93 |
| Calhoun | 3.65 |
| Callahan | -2.96 |
| Cameron | 11.78 |
| Camp | 4.73 |
| Carson | -2.48 |
| Cass | -1.39 |
| Castro | 4.64 |
| Chambers | 5.93 |
| Cherokee | 3.56 |
| Childress | -1.13 |
| Clay | -0.19 |
| Cochran | 8.61 |
| Coke | -9.41 |
| Coleman | -0.81 |
| Collin | 8.17 |
| Collingsworth | 0.65 |
| Colorado | -1.98 |
| Comal | 2.51 |
| Comanche | -1.39 |
| Concho | -5.12 |
| Cooke | 3.71 |
| Coryell | 7.88 |
| Cottle | -18.45 |
| Crane | 5.41 |
| Crockett | 4.55 |
| Crosby | 1 |
| Culberson | 4.76 |
| Dallam | 14.82 |
| Dallas | 9.62 |
| Dawson | 2.98 |
| Deaf Smith | 11.26 |
| Delta | -5.41 |
| Denton | 9.01 |
| DeWitt | 0.34 |
| Dickens | 0 |
| Dimmit | 10.01 |
| Donley | -7.49 |
| Duval | 2.08 |
| Eastland | -4.41 |
| Ector | 11.34 |
| Edwards | 0 |
| Ellis | 5.25 |
| El Paso | 10.63 |
| Erath | 5.83 |
| Falls | 1.67 |
| Fannin | -1.55 |
| Fayette | -4.25 |
| Fisher | -5.46 |
| Floyd | 6.67 |
| Foard | -7.71 |
| Fort Bend | 8.73 |
| Franklin | -0.66 |
| Freestone | 1.43 |
| Frio | 6.72 |
| Gaines | 13.8 |
| Galveston | 4.88 |
| Garza | 1.41 |
| Gillespie | -4 |
| Glasscock | -0.78 |
| Goliad | 2.03 |
| Gonzales | 4.79 |
| Gray | 3.57 |
| Grayson | 1.1 |
| Gregg | 4.88 |
| Grimes | 1.35 |
| Guadalupe | 5.4 |
| Hale | 6.4 |
| Hall | -11.5 |
| Hamilton | -2.67 |
| Hansford | 5.24 |
| Hardeman | 0.74 |
| Hardin | 2.52 |
| Harris | 10.14 |
| Harrison | 2.41 |
| Hartley | 4.96 |
| Haskell | -7.98 |
| Hays | 7.1 |
| Hemphill | 7.03 |
| Henderson | -2.03 |
| Hidalgo | 15.33 |
| Hill | -0.46 |
| Hockley | 6.55 |
| Hood | -0.19 |
| Hopkins | 1.02 |
| Houston | -4.13 |
| Howard | 2.26 |
| Hudspeth | 8.08 |
| Hunt | 2.36 |
| Hutchinson | 1.82 |
| Irion | -1.87 |
| Jack | 1.12 |
| Jackson | 1.8 |
| Jasper | 0.48 |
| Jeff Davis | -5.3 |
| Jefferson | 4.43 |
| Jim Hogg | 7.21 |
| Jim Wells | 5.85 |
| Johnson | 4.37 |
| Jones | -0.8 |
| Karnes | -1.62 |
| Kaufman | 5.79 |
| Kendall | -0.71 |
| Kenedy | 13.56 |
| Kent | -8.71 |
| Kerr | -4.84 |
| Kimble | -1.11 |
| King | 0 |
| Kinney | -1.1 |
| Kleberg | 8.95 |
| Knox | -2.95 |
| Lamar | -0.63 |
| Lamb | 1.89 |
| Lampasas | 0.9 |
| La Salle | 4.8 |
| Lavaca | -0.71 |
| Lee | 3.63 |
| Leon | -1.98 |
| Liberty | 3.92 |
| Limestone | 0.76 |
| Lipscomb | 3.46 |
| Live Oak | -0.94 |
| Llano | -8.2 |
| Loving | 0 |
| Lubbock | 5.81 |
| Lynn | 2.08 |
| McCulloch | -0.73 |
| McLennan | 5.19 |
| McMullen | -13.4 |
| Madison | 1.16 |
| Marion | -5.03 |
| Martin | 7.81 |
| Mason | -2.2 |
| Matagorda | 2.55 |
| Maverick | 14.05 |
| Medina | 2.11 |
| Menard | -1.84 |
| Midland | 10.56 |
| Milam | 0.79 |
| Mills | -5.15 |
| Mitchell | -0.11 |
| Montague | -3.55 |
| Montgomery | 6.69 |
| Moore | 13.46 |
| Morris | -1.02 |
| Motley | -3.35 |
| Nacogdoches | 5.36 |
| Navarro | 4.05 |
| Newton | -2.36 |
| Nolan | 1.93 |
| Nueces | 5.9 |
| Ochiltree | 6.1 |
| Oldham | 0 |
| Orange | 2.16 |
| Palo Pinto | 2.12 |
| Panola | 0.71 |
| Parker | 2.78 |
| Parmer | 7.04 |
| Pecos | 6.92 |
| Polk | -2.55 |
| Potter | 7.67 |
| Presidio | 9.07 |
| Rains | -1.64 |
| Randall | 4.89 |
| Reagan | 8.16 |
| Real | -11.69 |
| Red River | -4.05 |
| Reeves | 3.34 |
| Refugio | -1.51 |
| Roberts | -7.55 |
| Robertson | 2.74 |
| Rockwall | 5.31 |
| Runnels | -4.58 |
| Rusk | 1.83 |
| Sabine | -10.5 |
| San Augustine | -3.67 |
| San Jacinto | -0.67 |
| San Patricio | 5.28 |
| San Saba | -2.34 |
| Schleicher | 4.34 |
| Scurry | 5.41 |
| Shackelford | 3.56 |
| Shelby | 4.23 |
| Sherman | 3.6 |
| Smith | 4.82 |
| Somervell | 0.47 |
| Starr | 15.82 |
| Stephens | -2.74 |
| Sterling | 2.48 |
| Stonewall | -4.88 |
| Sutton | 6.58 |
| Swisher | 2.95 |
| Tarrant | 8.31 |
| Taylor | 5.64 |
| Terrell | -7.76 |
| Terry | 5.68 |
| Throckmorton | 0 |
| Titus | 6.69 |
| Tom Green | 4.89 |
| Travis | 9.65 |
| Trinity | -8.33 |
| Tyler | -1.77 |
| Upshur | 2.13 |
| Upton | 7.51 |
| Uvalde | 5.67 |
| Val Verde | 10.65 |
| Van Zandt | -1.43 |
| Victoria | 5.78 |
| Walker | 1.99 |
| Waller | 6.28 |
| Ward | 7.35 |
| Washington | 0.97 |
| Webb | 16.24 |
| Wharton | 2.43 |
| Wheeler | 1.24 |
| Wichita | 3.48 |
| Wilbarger | -0.98 |
| Willacy | 7.15 |
| Williamson | 8.47 |
| Wilson | 2.55 |
| Winkler | 8.67 |
| Wise | 4.53 |
| Wood | -5.43 |
| Yoakum | 12.05 |
| Young | 0.33 |
| Zapata | 13.97 |
| Zavala | 10.16 |
Popular Topics:
Find us
Copyright © Beautify Data LLC. All Rights Reserved.