North Carolina Hispanic Native Hawaiian And Pacific Islander alone Female or Women Population By County in 2010
Based on the US Census Vintage data estimates, in 2010, the North Carolina Hispanic Native Hawaiian And Pacific Islander alone female population was 2,199; and represented 0.05% of the total North Carolina female population in 2010.
Mecklenburg County had the highest number of Hispanic Native Hawaiian And Pacific Islander alone female population (252), followed by Burke County (171), and Cumberland County (157).
On the other hand, Washington County had the lowest Hispanic Native Hawaiian And Pacific Islander alone female population (0), followed by Warren County (0), and Tyrrell County (0).
You can see similar information for other ethnicity and racial groups in North Carolina.
You can also see similar information for other states and also by state for the United States.
Hover over or click on the counties to see the number and percentage of each county's Hispanic Native Hawaiian And Pacific Islander alone female population. The data can also be filtered, sorted, and explored further in a table below.
| County | Female Population | % of County Female Population |
|---|---|---|
| Alamance | 26 | 0.03 |
| Alexander | 1 | 0.01 |
| Alleghany | 1 | 0.02 |
| Anson | 3 | 0.02 |
| Ashe | 1 | 0.01 |
| Avery | 1 | 0.01 |
| Beaufort | 13 | 0.05 |
| Bertie | 4 | 0.04 |
| Bladen | 1 | 0.01 |
| Brunswick | 15 | 0.03 |
| Buncombe | 37 | 0.03 |
| Burke | 171 | 0.38 |
| Cabarrus | 28 | 0.03 |
| Caldwell | 15 | 0.04 |
| Camden | 1 | 0.02 |
| Carteret | 7 | 0.02 |
| Caswell | 1 | 0.01 |
| Catawba | 14 | 0.02 |
| Chatham | 14 | 0.04 |
| Cherokee | 2 | 0.01 |
| Chowan | 10 | 0.13 |
| Clay | 0 | 0.00 |
| Cleveland | 2 | 0.00 |
| Columbus | 5 | 0.02 |
| Craven | 23 | 0.04 |
| Cumberland | 157 | 0.10 |
| Currituck | 1 | 0.01 |
| Dare | 2 | 0.01 |
| Davidson | 7 | 0.01 |
| Davie | 0 | 0.00 |
| Duplin | 104 | 0.35 |
| Durham | 59 | 0.04 |
| Edgecombe | 4 | 0.01 |
| Forsyth | 78 | 0.04 |
| Franklin | 21 | 0.07 |
| Gaston | 23 | 0.02 |
| Gates | 0 | 0.00 |
| Graham | 0 | 0.00 |
| Granville | 7 | 0.03 |
| Greene | 20 | 0.20 |
| Guilford | 78 | 0.03 |
| Halifax | 13 | 0.05 |
| Harnett | 18 | 0.03 |
| Haywood | 6 | 0.02 |
| Henderson | 14 | 0.03 |
| Hertford | 1 | 0.01 |
| Hoke | 32 | 0.13 |
| Hyde | 0 | 0.00 |
| Iredell | 19 | 0.02 |
| Jackson | 0 | 0.00 |
| Johnston | 34 | 0.04 |
| Jones | 0 | 0.00 |
| Lee | 26 | 0.09 |
| Lenoir | 30 | 0.10 |
| Lincoln | 13 | 0.03 |
| McDowell | 8 | 0.04 |
| Macon | 2 | 0.01 |
| Madison | 0 | 0.00 |
| Martin | 8 | 0.06 |
| Mecklenburg | 252 | 0.05 |
| Mitchell | 9 | 0.11 |
| Montgomery | 3 | 0.02 |
| Moore | 54 | 0.12 |
| Nash | 6 | 0.01 |
| New Hanover | 32 | 0.03 |
| Northampton | 1 | 0.01 |
| Onslow | 55 | 0.07 |
| Orange | 16 | 0.02 |
| Pamlico | 0 | 0.00 |
| Pasquotank | 2 | 0.01 |
| Pender | 6 | 0.02 |
| Perquimans | 0 | 0.00 |
| Person | 0 | 0.00 |
| Pitt | 76 | 0.09 |
| Polk | 0 | 0.00 |
| Randolph | 26 | 0.04 |
| Richmond | 21 | 0.09 |
| Robeson | 33 | 0.05 |
| Rockingham | 17 | 0.04 |
| Rowan | 16 | 0.02 |
| Rutherford | 10 | 0.03 |
| Sampson | 29 | 0.09 |
| Scotland | 3 | 0.02 |
| Stanly | 63 | 0.21 |
| Stokes | 2 | 0.01 |
| Surry | 23 | 0.06 |
| Swain | 0 | 0.00 |
| Transylvania | 3 | 0.02 |
| Tyrrell | 0 | 0.00 |
| Union | 22 | 0.02 |
| Vance | 3 | 0.01 |
| Wake | 143 | 0.03 |
| Warren | 0 | 0.00 |
| Washington | 0 | 0.00 |
| Watauga | 1 | 0.00 |
| Wayne | 36 | 0.06 |
| Wilkes | 8 | 0.02 |
| Wilson | 10 | 0.02 |
| Yadkin | 25 | 0.13 |
| Yancey | 12 | 0.13 |
