North Carolina Hispanic Asian alone Female or Women Population By County in 2022
Based on the US Census Vintage data estimates, in 2022, the North Carolina Hispanic Asian alone female population was 6,410; and represented 0.12% of the total North Carolina female population in 2022.
Mecklenburg County had the highest number of Hispanic Asian alone female population (722), followed by Wake County (622), and Guilford County (330).
On the other hand, Washington County had the lowest Hispanic Asian alone female population (0), followed by Jones County (0), and Graham County (0).
You can see similar information for other ethnicity and racial groups in North Carolina.
You can also see similar information for other states and also by state for the United States.
Hover over or click on the counties to see the number and percentage of each county's Hispanic Asian alone female population. The data can also be filtered, sorted, and explored further in a table below.
| County | Female Population | % of County Female Population |
|---|---|---|
| Alamance | 111 | 0.12 |
| Alexander | 16 | 0.09 |
| Alleghany | 19 | 0.34 |
| Anson | 9 | 0.08 |
| Ashe | 2 | 0.02 |
| Avery | 11 | 0.14 |
| Beaufort | 28 | 0.12 |
| Bertie | 5 | 0.06 |
| Bladen | 20 | 0.13 |
| Brunswick | 57 | 0.07 |
| Buncombe | 108 | 0.08 |
| Burke | 55 | 0.13 |
| Cabarrus | 163 | 0.14 |
| Caldwell | 27 | 0.07 |
| Camden | 3 | 0.06 |
| Carteret | 25 | 0.07 |
| Caswell | 4 | 0.04 |
| Catawba | 136 | 0.16 |
| Chatham | 54 | 0.13 |
| Cherokee | 8 | 0.05 |
| Chowan | 5 | 0.07 |
| Clay | 1 | 0.02 |
| Cleveland | 47 | 0.09 |
| Columbus | 37 | 0.15 |
| Craven | 75 | 0.15 |
| Cumberland | 241 | 0.14 |
| Currituck | 27 | 0.18 |
| Dare | 15 | 0.08 |
| Davidson | 152 | 0.17 |
| Davie | 39 | 0.17 |
| Duplin | 70 | 0.28 |
| Durham | 260 | 0.15 |
| Edgecombe | 14 | 0.05 |
| Forsyth | 247 | 0.12 |
| Franklin | 42 | 0.11 |
| Gaston | 60 | 0.05 |
| Gates | 1 | 0.02 |
| Graham | 0 | 0.00 |
| Granville | 36 | 0.12 |
| Greene | 22 | 0.25 |
| Guilford | 330 | 0.12 |
| Halifax | 18 | 0.07 |
| Harnett | 113 | 0.16 |
| Haywood | 7 | 0.02 |
| Henderson | 60 | 0.10 |
| Hertford | 18 | 0.18 |
| Hoke | 57 | 0.21 |
| Hyde | 1 | 0.05 |
| Iredell | 95 | 0.10 |
| Jackson | 24 | 0.11 |
| Johnston | 161 | 0.14 |
| Jones | 0 | 0.00 |
| Lee | 69 | 0.21 |
| Lenoir | 45 | 0.16 |
| Lincoln | 33 | 0.07 |
| McDowell | 30 | 0.14 |
| Macon | 27 | 0.14 |
| Madison | 3 | 0.03 |
| Martin | 7 | 0.06 |
| Mecklenburg | 722 | 0.12 |
| Mitchell | 11 | 0.14 |
| Montgomery | 37 | 0.28 |
| Moore | 64 | 0.12 |
| Nash | 85 | 0.17 |
| New Hanover | 91 | 0.07 |
| Northampton | 7 | 0.08 |
| Onslow | 155 | 0.17 |
| Orange | 129 | 0.16 |
| Pamlico | 3 | 0.05 |
| Pasquotank | 23 | 0.11 |
| Pender | 52 | 0.16 |
| Perquimans | 5 | 0.07 |
| Person | 12 | 0.06 |
| Pitt | 122 | 0.13 |
| Polk | 16 | 0.15 |
| Randolph | 78 | 0.11 |
| Richmond | 44 | 0.20 |
| Robeson | 61 | 0.10 |
| Rockingham | 29 | 0.06 |
| Rowan | 80 | 0.11 |
| Rutherford | 24 | 0.07 |
| Sampson | 72 | 0.24 |
| Scotland | 2 | 0.01 |
| Stanly | 29 | 0.09 |
| Stokes | 6 | 0.03 |
| Surry | 79 | 0.22 |
| Swain | 5 | 0.07 |
| Transylvania | 4 | 0.02 |
| Tyrrell | 2 | 0.12 |
| Union | 124 | 0.10 |
| Vance | 30 | 0.13 |
| Wake | 622 | 0.10 |
| Warren | 10 | 0.11 |
| Washington | 0 | 0.00 |
| Watauga | 23 | 0.08 |
| Wayne | 83 | 0.14 |
| Wilkes | 21 | 0.06 |
| Wilson | 55 | 0.13 |
| Yadkin | 38 | 0.20 |
| Yancey | 5 | 0.05 |
