North Carolina Non-Hispanic Native Hawaiian And Pacific Islander alone Male or Men Population By County in 2012
Based on the US Census Vintage data estimates, in 2012, the North Carolina Non-Hispanic Native Hawaiian And Pacific Islander alone male population was 2,943; and represented 0.06% of the total North Carolina male population in 2012.
Cumberland County had the highest number of Non-Hispanic Native Hawaiian And Pacific Islander alone male population (546), followed by Mecklenburg County (226), and Onslow County (225).
On the other hand, Yancey County had the lowest Non-Hispanic Native Hawaiian And Pacific Islander alone male population (0), followed by Tyrrell County (0), and Person County (0).
You can see similar information for other ethnicity and racial groups in North Carolina.
You can also see similar information for other states and also by state for the United States.
Hover over or click on the counties to see the number and percentage of each county's Non-Hispanic Native Hawaiian And Pacific Islander alone male population. The data can also be filtered, sorted, and explored further in a table below.
| County | Male Population | % of County Male Population |
|---|---|---|
| Alamance | 32 | 0.04 |
| Alexander | 4 | 0.02 |
| Alleghany | 2 | 0.04 |
| Anson | 2 | 0.02 |
| Ashe | 3 | 0.02 |
| Avery | 2 | 0.02 |
| Beaufort | 3 | 0.01 |
| Bertie | 0 | 0.00 |
| Bladen | 4 | 0.02 |
| Brunswick | 39 | 0.07 |
| Buncombe | 165 | 0.14 |
| Burke | 94 | 0.21 |
| Cabarrus | 36 | 0.04 |
| Caldwell | 5 | 0.01 |
| Camden | 1 | 0.02 |
| Carteret | 38 | 0.11 |
| Caswell | 4 | 0.03 |
| Catawba | 22 | 0.03 |
| Chatham | 11 | 0.04 |
| Cherokee | 6 | 0.05 |
| Chowan | 1 | 0.01 |
| Clay | 1 | 0.02 |
| Cleveland | 9 | 0.02 |
| Columbus | 20 | 0.07 |
| Craven | 64 | 0.12 |
| Cumberland | 546 | 0.33 |
| Currituck | 2 | 0.02 |
| Dare | 11 | 0.06 |
| Davidson | 15 | 0.02 |
| Davie | 3 | 0.02 |
| Duplin | 17 | 0.06 |
| Durham | 56 | 0.04 |
| Edgecombe | 10 | 0.04 |
| Forsyth | 92 | 0.05 |
| Franklin | 3 | 0.01 |
| Gaston | 24 | 0.02 |
| Gates | 3 | 0.05 |
| Graham | 0 | 0.00 |
| Granville | 13 | 0.04 |
| Greene | 3 | 0.03 |
| Guilford | 121 | 0.05 |
| Halifax | 3 | 0.01 |
| Harnett | 106 | 0.18 |
| Haywood | 6 | 0.02 |
| Henderson | 84 | 0.16 |
| Hertford | 0 | 0.00 |
| Hoke | 53 | 0.21 |
| Hyde | 0 | 0.00 |
| Iredell | 31 | 0.04 |
| Jackson | 9 | 0.05 |
| Johnston | 29 | 0.03 |
| Jones | 0 | 0.00 |
| Lee | 16 | 0.06 |
| Lenoir | 15 | 0.05 |
| Lincoln | 4 | 0.01 |
| McDowell | 0 | 0.00 |
| Macon | 2 | 0.01 |
| Madison | 3 | 0.03 |
| Martin | 2 | 0.02 |
| Mecklenburg | 226 | 0.05 |
| Mitchell | 1 | 0.01 |
| Montgomery | 1 | 0.01 |
| Moore | 17 | 0.04 |
| Nash | 10 | 0.02 |
| New Hanover | 88 | 0.09 |
| Northampton | 1 | 0.01 |
| Onslow | 225 | 0.21 |
| Orange | 19 | 0.03 |
| Pamlico | 10 | 0.15 |
| Pasquotank | 6 | 0.03 |
| Pender | 10 | 0.04 |
| Perquimans | 0 | 0.00 |
| Person | 0 | 0.00 |
| Pitt | 57 | 0.07 |
| Polk | 1 | 0.01 |
| Randolph | 11 | 0.02 |
| Richmond | 3 | 0.01 |
| Robeson | 55 | 0.08 |
| Rockingham | 23 | 0.05 |
| Rowan | 21 | 0.03 |
| Rutherford | 2 | 0.01 |
| Sampson | 28 | 0.09 |
| Scotland | 7 | 0.04 |
| Stanly | 3 | 0.01 |
| Stokes | 4 | 0.02 |
| Surry | 4 | 0.01 |
| Swain | 3 | 0.04 |
| Transylvania | 2 | 0.01 |
| Tyrrell | 0 | 0.00 |
| Union | 36 | 0.04 |
| Vance | 5 | 0.02 |
| Wake | 153 | 0.03 |
| Warren | 2 | 0.02 |
| Washington | 1 | 0.02 |
| Watauga | 6 | 0.02 |
| Wayne | 26 | 0.04 |
| Wilkes | 9 | 0.03 |
| Wilson | 14 | 0.04 |
| Yadkin | 3 | 0.02 |
| Yancey | 0 | 0.00 |
